Back to all posts
The End of the AI Euphoria Phase

The End of the AI Euphoria Phase

Artificial IntelligenceMarketsInvestingStartupsTechnology

Summary

Every technological revolution arrives with a capital cycle attached: railroads, radio, the dot-com boom, clean tech. AI is no exception. This piece argues that the IPOs of OpenAI and Anthropic will likely mark the high-water mark of the current AI bubble, the point where enthusiasm broadens from insiders to the public, narratives harden, and retail access opens up. That doesn't mean AI collapses. It means the next phase rewards execution over narrative, distribution over novelty, and profitability over scale at any cost.

Every technological revolution comes with a capital cycle. Railroads. Radio. The dot-com boom. Clean tech. In each case a genuinely transformative technology pulled in enormous investment, soaring valuations, retail speculation, and eventually a peak.

AI won't be the exception. If history is any guide, the crest of this cycle arrives alongside the IPOs of OpenAI and Anthropic.

Why IPOs Mark Peaks

Market tops form when enthusiasm broadens from insiders to the general public. By the time a flagship company lists at an enormous valuation, three things are usually true.

Private capital has already taken most of the early upside. Venture firms, strategic investors and employees have marked valuations up through successive rounds.

The narrative has hardened. The story has moved from "this might work" to "this changes everything". Scepticism thins out and coverage turns celebratory.

Retail access opens. An IPO lets ordinary investors buy into something that was previously private, which has historically been a late-stage signal.

Netscape's 1995 listing lit the fuse on the dot-com boom. Facebook's 2012 IPO closed one phase of social media growth and opened a more sober, monetisation-focused one. IPOs don't cause peaks. They tend to coincide with them.

Why These Two Companies Matter

OpenAI and Anthropic aren't simply AI startups. They're the symbolic anchors of the generative AI era. Their models define the frontier, their partnerships shape the cloud ecosystem, and their private valuations already price in trillion-dollar expectations.

A listing from either would bring a valuation in the hundreds of billions, heavy retail participation, saturation media coverage, and immediate comparisons to Google, Amazon and Nvidia.

That moment would be the financial formalisation of the AI boom.

The Late-Cycle Signals Are Already Here

The current wave carries several familiar markers: hyperscaler arms races in infrastructure, GPU demand running well ahead of supply, seed-stage companies raising at unprecedented valuations, "AI" appended to nearly every pitch deck, and public markets rewarding almost any exposure to the theme.

None of that invalidates the technology. The internet was real. So were mobile and cloud. Capital cycles overshoot even when the underlying shift is genuine.

What Comes After the Peak

If the IPOs do mark the top, AI doesn't collapse. Valuations compress, margins normalise, consolidation accelerates, and attention shifts from capability demos to business models that actually work.

The next phase rewards execution over narrative, distribution over novelty, and profitability over scale at any cost.

A Peak Is Not an End

It's worth separating the technological trajectory from the financial exuberance. AI will keep advancing, models will keep improving, and use cases will keep expanding across healthcare, energy, defence, education and finance.

Markets still move in cycles. When the flagship companies of a revolution finally ring the opening bell, it usually means the story has travelled from speculation to saturation.

If and when OpenAI and Anthropic list, it won't mark the end of AI's impact. It may well mark the high-water mark of this particular bubble.

You may also enjoy…

InvestingFinanceStrategy

The Punch Card Rule: What If You Only Got 20 Investments for Life

Warren Buffett's punch card rule imagines an investor limited to 20 decisions for life. The scarcity forces deep research, concentration in your best ideas and the patience to do nothing, the opposite of what frictionless modern markets encourage. You don't need a literal card. Just invest as if you had one.

5 min read
Artificial IntelligenceCareerTechnology

Generalist or Specialist: Who Wins in the Age of AI?

AI lowers the cost of specialised execution, so the bottleneck moves from doing to deciding. That favours breadth, but depth still matters wherever the model breaks. The durable profile is both: wide enough to use AI across domains, deep enough to go beyond it. Intelligence is cheap. Judgement is not.

Artificial IntelligenceEconomicsPolicy

AI and the Wealth Gap: Acceleration or Equalizer?

AI is a multiplier, not an equaliser by default. Early gains flow to capital owners, middle-income work hollows out, and power shifts from labour to capital, within countries and between them. The same tools could widen opportunity, but only if access, education and ownership are designed for it.

8 min read